Can my Ex Get my Separate Non-Marital Property in the Divorce?

One of the most common questions people ask me is something like this: “can my ex get my non-marital property in the divorce?”

In Utah, the general answer is “no.”

This is because non-marital property (Utah divorce attorneys call it “separate property”) doesn’t belong to the marriage. Since it doesn’t belong to the marriage, the court won’t take it from one spouse and give it to the other.

Property might be non-marital for lots of different reasons. The most common reasons why property is separate are:

  1. The property is a gift to one spouse from that spouse’s family.
  2. The property is an inheritance.
  3. The property is money for a personal injury.
  4. The property belonged to one spouse before the marriage.

Exception to the Separate Property Rule

Despite the straightforward rule above, there’s an exception.

With lawyers there’s always an exception.

The exception is this: Utah divorce courts can take separate property and essentially make it marital, then divide it during divorce, but really only if there are extraordinary circumstances where it would be unfair not to do so.

We ran in to this very sort of situation during a case we took to trial a few months ago.

The other side argued we couldn’t get to the separate property to pay for child support and alimony.

We said we could because there were extraordinary circumstances, and if the judge didn’t divide the separate property, it would have been extremely unfair for our client and the kids.

We won the argument and got the property for our client and the children.

Closing Argument from Trial

I’ve looked on the internet to see if anyone else has written about separate property being divided in Utah divorces.

There’s really nothing out there, so I asked my client if we could reproduce part of our winning closing argument from trial.

Our client graciously agreed, so, here you go (I’ve changed names to protect people’s identities):

“The main problem with Opposing Party’s separate property argument is that Utah appellate courts have regularly allowed separate, premarital property to be divided during divorce.

“For example, in Mortensen v. Mortensen, 760 P.2d 304, 306–309 (1988), The Utah Supreme Court recognized that even inherited monies may be divided in divorce, and a portion given to the non-inheriting spouse. While recognizing the general rule that monies and properties brought in to the marriage (or inherited) is separate property, the Court in Mortensen also explicitly recognized “[s]uch property might also be utilized to provide housing for minor children or utilized in other extraordinary situations where equity so demands.” 760 P.2d at 308.

“To reach this conclusion, the Mortensen Court, on pages 306–08, relied on Weaver v. Weaver, 442 P.2d 928, which awarded a wife part of a family gift in lieu of alimony and attorney fees.

“Utah’s recognition that separate, premarital property can be divided at divorce is not limited to Mortensen and Weaver. In Kunzler v. Kunzler, 190 P.3d 497, 2008 UT App. 263, The Utah Supreme Court affirmed the District Court’s decision to award Mrs. Kunzler a portion of Mr. Kunzler’s real property — gifted to him by his siblings and mother. The District Court awarded the interest in the separate, non-marital properties because the husband’s limited income did not allow him to “provide sufficient alimony payment to [Mrs. Kunzler] to compensate her for twenty-three years of marriage where she managed the household and raised seven children.” ¶ 37. In paragraph 36, the Court noted the general rule that separate property is separate, and then, relying on preexisting case law on the subject, recognized an exception to the general rule: “However, separate property is not totally beyond a court’s reach in equitable property division. . . . Under Utah law, a trial court may award the separate property of one spouse to the other spouse in extraordinary circumstances where equity so demands.”

“Additionally, the Utah Court of Appeals, in Jensen v. Jensen, 203 P.3d 1020, 2009 UT App. 1, standing on the shoulders of Mortensen and its predecessors, recognized that separate gifted property was subject to equitable division in divorce.

“What has been provided is only a portion of the case law that recognizes separate property (both real and personal), whether premarital, inherited, or gifted, is subject to equitable division at divorce.”

Call Brown Family Law

If you find yourself facing a divorce, please call 801.685.9999 for a legal in-person consultation, or use our online scheduling tool.

Protect Your Money And Your Family

We remove fear associated with divorce, protect your money & maximize time with your kids!

We're here to help. Let's determine your best options.

Call Us 24//7 at 801-685-9999 to Speak with a Live Representative

Utah Divorce FAQs
Top 100 Divorce Blog
What Clients Are Saying…
BrownLaw icon
Excellent
Brown Family Law
4.8
Based on 918 reviews
Great support, Russell and Connor were amazing and got my case dismissed in only 2 months. Great communication with weekly calls. Easy to work with and were very conscious on not overspending my budget. Great team.
Response from the owner:Daniel, thank you for the kind words, and happy Russell and Connor did well for you.
Anne Greyson long was great to work with she really listens and fights for her clients thank you so much for all your hard work
Response from the owner:Thank you, Heather. Glad Anne-Greyson helped you so well.
You get what you pay for, and the Brown Family team is worth every penny. We truly appreciated their team-based approach, making sure that every detail of our case was thoughtfully handled. They were incredibly easy to work with, kept us informed throughout the process, and made sure no question ever went unanswered. By far the best family attorneys I’ve worked with, and the only ones I’ll call if I ever need legal help again.
Response from the owner:Chris, thank you. Glad we were able to guide you through your process.
Andrew made the whole process smooth and quick! Kept me updated on any changes, and followed up with me constantly!

Made me feel at ease throughout the whole process and made sure I felt seen/ heard!
Response from the owner:Joselyn, thank you for the kind words.
David Handy is my attorney and he is excellent. He understands my cases and is well informed to defend my needs and the needs of my kids. He is supportive and compassionate. Telling me how things are and what to expect. He does very well with my high conflict cases (protective order and divorce). I highly recommend him and the Brown Family Law firm. Everyone I have talked to is helpful. Especially Conor Schetzel who is currently the paralegal on my cases.
Response from the owner:Suzanne, thank you and glad David has taken care of you.
Nathaniel Garrabrandt and Brown Family Law is where I send people who are seeking Divorce. Highly professional and compassionate. Thank you!
Response from the owner:Jaren, thank you for the referrals.
I cannot say enough good about my experience with Brown Family Law. Ray Hingson and paralegal Carren did an excellent job with my case. I will definitely use this firm again for any legal issues.
Response from the owner:Meghann, so glad Ray and Carren took good care of you.
I have worked with Andrew Christensen many times in a variety of situations. I am very impressed with his friendly demeanor in a difficult situation. I would highly recommend him to you without any reservations.
Response from the owner:Thank you, Monica.
Highly recommend Brown Family Law. Life is hard, divorce is harder, and Andrew Christensen is your guy to help you through to the other side.
Response from the owner:Mike, thank you for the kind words and the referrals.
When you’re going through a tough time and need legal help, this firm isn’t just a one-person operation. It’s a team of attorneys who work together to support you every step of the way. So you’re not just getting a lawyer, you’re getting a legal team behind you.

Navigating the legal system was a steep learning curve for me, and my situation was fairly complex. What stood out about this law firm was the way multiple attorneys collaborated to address my case. It wasn’t just one person working in isolation, but a team supporting each other to find the best path forward. That kind of collective effort is a real strength, especially in hard out complex situations like mine.

There was one issue I felt should have had a different outcome with the court. When I brought it up, the team responded in a very professional and respectful manner, which I truly appreciated. It came to my understanding that the legal system sometimes works in a way that is distant than I thought. This was presented to me in a way that someone outside of the legal system could understand.

In my experience, this firm takes the time to not only assist you, but also help you understand why things are happening. That made a big difference for me, and it’s something that really sets them apart.
Response from the owner:David, thank you for our conversation and taking the time to leave this review.
yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7

Categories